Skip to content
Jalen Milroe

#4Jalen Milroe

QB·Alabama·202420239.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jalen Milroe is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Alabama. Jalen's 2024 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 476 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jalen Milroe's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
205/319 Comp/Att2844 Pass yards16 Pass TD11 INT64.3% Comp %
Rushing
726 Rush yards20 Rush TD168 Carries4.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency65
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch56
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.35 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky (SP+ -2).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3501.35Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: +1.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Florida: +0.38 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wisconsin: +0.58 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Georgia: +0.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Vanderbilt: +0.46 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs South Carolina: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: -0.02 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Missouri: +0.36 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs LSU: +0.87 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mercer: +0.97 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma: -0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Auburn: +0.50 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsWestern KentuckyW63-0-2.27/92003098.77921.35
2vsSouth FloridaW42-16-2.316/261942050.5220.38
3@WisconsinW42-103.012/171963089.97520.58
5vsGeorgiaW41-3424.327/333742198.511720.43
6@VanderbiltL35-404.918/243101177.91010.46
7vsSouth CarolinaW27-2516.916/232091269.23620.29
8@TennesseeL17-2422.025/452391265.3110-0.02
9vsMissouriW34-014.016/262150071.75010.36
11@LSUW42-1315.912/181090099.318540.87
12vsMercerW52-711/161862091.84310.97
13@OklahomaL3-249.511/261640315.470-0.07
14vsAuburnW28-149.518/242560197.310430.50
20vsMichiganL13-1910.616/321921126.570

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.8%
Passing plays
90.2%
Rushing plays
31.8%
Standard downs
50.1%
Passing downs
78.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / 0.47

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.500−0.342024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Alabama
11.0
284.8
2024Alabama
9.3
252.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.