Skip to content
Jalen Berger

#0Jalen Berger

RB·UCLA·2025

Jalen Berger is a Committee Back for UCLA. Jalen's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 87 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jalen Berger's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
364 Rush yards2 Rush TD81 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions70 Rec yards2 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness30
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving47
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.01 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Michigan State (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0101.01Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UNLV: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs New Mexico: -0.80 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Northwestern: -0.15 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Penn State: +0.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Michigan State: +1.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Maryland: -0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Indiana: -0.26 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Nebraska: +0.20 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ohio State: -0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington: -0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs USC: +0.14 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUtahL10-4322.2571.400.28
2@UNLVL23-304.36315.2022100.19
3vsNew MexicoL10-350.92-2-1.00-0.80
5@NorthwesternL14-175.84133.30-0.15
6vsPenn StateW42-3718.16294.800.23
7@Michigan StateW38-13-3.412897.4132421.01
8vsMarylandW20-170.619653.40100-0.21
9@IndianaL6-5632.45173.40-0.26
11vsNebraskaL21-286.25193.8121900.20
12@Ohio StateL10-4830.14133.30-0.15
13vsWashingtonL14-4818.46264.30260-0.10
14@USCL10-2916.97578.100.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.3%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
23.0%
Standard downs
14.8%
Passing downs
6.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.