Skip to content
Jackson Arnold

#11Jackson Arnold

QB·UNLV·2026

Jackson Arnold is a Dual-Threat QB for UNLV. Jackson's 2026 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 131 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jackson Arnold's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
51/82 Comp/Att601 Pass yards2 Pass TD0 INT62.2% Comp %
Rushing
132 Rush yards3 Rush TD51 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

55
Attempts
8.5y
Avg depth
3.2y
After catch
60%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.5 yards in the air on an average throw 0.7 yards deeper than the median. Another 3.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 44y
2
0% · 0y
2
100% · 71y
short
9
56% · 32y
21
62% · 146y
20
60% · 114y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat82
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch4
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3000.30Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Texas: +0.12 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsMemphisL21-272.125/372912070.6541
1@Hawai'iW21-6-7.08/181160081.58920.30
2@North TexasL6-44-13.218/2719400-1100.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.0%
Passing plays
94.8%
Rushing plays
36.3%
Standard downs
55.9%
Passing downs
71.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.