Skip to content
Ife Adeyi

#2Ife Adeyi

Ife Adeyi is a Versatile WR for Sam Houston. Ife's 2024 season produced 26.2 total EPA across 32 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ife Adeyi's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
30 Receptions271 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec
Returns
10 Punt returns63 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume12
  • Explosiveness14
  • Consistency77
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.75 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.06 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Rice (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0602.06Wk 1 vs Rice: +2.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UCF: +1.74 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Hawai'i: +0.70 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Texas State: +0.99 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UTEP: +1.41 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Western Kentucky: -0.19 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: +1.91 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Kennesaw State: +0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Jacksonville State: +1.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Liberty: +0.10 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@RiceW34-14-11.456312.61322.06
2@UCFL14-452.822110.50131.74
3vsHawai'iW31-13-10.94328.00170.70
4vsNew Mexico StateW31-11-19.033110.3013
5vsTexas StateW40-395.4188.0080.99
6@UTEPW41-21-22.722211.00121.41
8vsWestern KentuckyL14-31-2.2-0.19
10vsLouisiana TechW9-3-11.611010.00101.91
12@Kennesaw StateW23-17-25.15214.2070.04
13@Jacksonville StateL11-21-1.0177.0071.30
14vsLibertyW20-180.222311.50150.10
20vsGeorgia SouthernW31-26-1.74338.3016

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.2%
Passing plays
8.0%
Rushing plays
1.4%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
3.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.61
Passing downs
1.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.77 / 1.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.