Skip to content
Haynes King

#10Haynes King

QB·Georgia Tech·202520237.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Haynes King is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Georgia Tech. Haynes's 2025 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 546 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Haynes King's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
252/361 Comp/Att2951 Pass yards14 Pass TD6 INT69.8% Comp %
Rushing
953 Rush yards15 Rush TD185 Carries5.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat94
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch76
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7000.70Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Clemson: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Temple: +0.35 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wake Forest: +0.14 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: +0.61 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Duke: +0.66 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Syracuse: +0.70 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs NC State: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Boston College: +0.48 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: +0.06 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.13 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@ColoradoW27-20-8.313/201430189.115630.57
3vsClemsonW24-219.520/282110069.110310.33
4vsTempleW45-24-5.113/181612065.71510.35
5@Wake ForestW30-295.728/422431073.910620.14
7vsVirginia TechW35-20-10.120/242131092.86020.61
8@DukeW27-186.614/212050085.912010.66
9vsSyracuseW41-16-13.125/313043093.29120.70
10@NC StateL36-484.825/354082184.210320.47
12@Boston CollegeW36-34-8.526/343711074.65300.48
13vsPittsburghL28-428.427/412572233.97610.06
14vsGeorgiaL9-1624.119/271810163.23900.13
20vsBYUL21-2515.922/402542182.8310

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
67.8%
Passing plays
99.7%
Rushing plays
41.6%
Standard downs
62.0%
Passing downs
85.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.790−0.012025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Georgia Tech
10.6
274.8
2025Georgia Tech
7.8
212.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.