Skip to content
Gavin Williams

#21Gavin Williams

Gavin Williams is a Pass-Catching Back for Northern Illinois. Gavin's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 156 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Gavin Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
749 Rush yards4 Rush TD139 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions140 Rec yards1 Rec TD5.6 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns14 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume50
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency7
  • Receiving70
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency7th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.22 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Central Michigan (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs Western Illinois: -0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Notre Dame: -0.17 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Buffalo: +0.12 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs NC State: +0.23 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Massachusetts: +0.30 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Bowling Green: -0.04 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Toledo: +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ball State: -0.86 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Western Michigan: +0.72 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Akron: +0.74 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Miami (OH): -0.13 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Central Michigan: +0.80 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWestern IllinoisW54-159414.60280-0.24
2@Notre DameW16-1423.917593.50-0.17
4vsBuffaloL20-23-4.010636.302200.12
5@NC StateL17-243.95193.8021500.23
6vsMassachusettsW34-20-21.9191256.610.30
7@Bowling GreenW17-7-1.8291023.50210-0.04
8vsToledoL6-13-2.516784.9021700.32
9@Ball StateL23-25-19.8111.00-0.86
11@Western MichiganW42-28-10.28425.3132210.72
12vsAkronW29-16-17.9910111.2123500.74
13@Miami (OH)L9-201.36457.504120-0.13
14vsCentral MichiganW24-16-15.866510.8132600.80
20vsFresno StateW28-20-3.8482.00320

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.6%
Passing plays
6.8%
Rushing plays
25.2%
Standard downs
19.0%
Passing downs
14.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.22
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.