#6Garrett Greene

QB·West Virginia·2024

Garrett Greene is a Dual-Threat QB for West Virginia. Garrett's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 416 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Garrett Greene's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing

189/316 Comp/Att2300 Pass yards15 Pass TD12 INT59.8% Comp %

Rushing

751 Rush yards6 Rush TD133 Carries5.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat100
Consistency80
Clutch100

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.22 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UAlbany.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsPenn State	L12-34	24.6	15/28	161	0	0	37.1	5	0	-0.02
2	vsUAlbany	W49-14	—	17/23	236	3	0	95.2	68	1	0.66
3	@Pittsburgh	L34-38	4.9	16/30	210	2	2	80.7	49	0	0.34
4	vsKansas	W32-28	4.9	15/30	295	2	2	78.8	87	1	0.39
6	@Oklahoma State	W38-14	-2.6	9/15	159	0	0	95.8	86	1	0.65
7	vsIowa State	L16-28	10.3	18/32	206	1	2	66.4	87	0	0.46
8	vsKansas State	L18-45	14.1	9/19	85	1	2	50.1	89	0	0.16
12	vsBaylor	L35-49	8.4	19/39	237	2	1	61.4	129	2	0.23
13	vsUCF	W31-21	2.8	13/21	118	1	0	49.5	49	0	0.21
14	@Texas Tech	L15-52	4.3	29/39	265	1	2	25.1	7	0	0.14
20	vsMemphis	L37-42	9.6	29/40	328	2	1	90.4	95	1	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

56.1%

Passing plays

93.2%

Rushing plays

26.0%

Standard downs

49.0%

Passing downs

69.9%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.17
Passing downs: 0.56
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.28 / 0.49

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).