Skip to content
Duncan Brune

#6Duncan Brune

RB·Ohio·2025

Duncan Brune is a Committee Back for Ohio. Duncan's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 123 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Duncan Brune's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
585 Rush yards8 Rush TD120 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions57 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.4 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns37 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume40
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving23
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Northern Illinois (SP+ -17).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Rutgers: -0.19 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs West Virginia: -0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ohio State: -0.30 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.46 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Bowling Green: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ball State: +0.14 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Northern Illinois: +0.68 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.21 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Miami (OH): -0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Western Michigan: -0.34 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: +0.47 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Buffalo: +0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@RutgersL31-341.06223.70-0.19
2vsWest VirginiaW17-10-6.89293.201120-0.14
3@Ohio StateL9-3730.19192.10100-0.30
4vsGardner-WebbW52-3516885.5313200.46
5vsBowling GreenW35-20-12.67578.100.38
6@Ball StateL14-20-23.08263.310.14
8vsNorthern IllinoisW48-21-16.7161267.9211000.68
9@Eastern MichiganW28-21-14.77142.00130-0.21
11vsMiami (OH)W24-20-3.43124.00-0.16
12@Western MichiganL13-17-1.45153.00-0.34
13vsMassachusettsW42-14-36.614846.020.47
14@BuffaloW31-26-7.512695.800.08
20vsUNLVW17-104.38243.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.1%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
22.2%
Standard downs
16.2%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.61 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.