Skip to content
Dillon Johnson

#7Dillon Johnson

RB·Washington·20234.0 pts line value1st Round

Dillon Johnson is a Featured Back for Washington. Dillon's 2023 season ranks in the 75th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 246 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dillon Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1195 Rush yards16 Rush TD233 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
24 Receptions190 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency75
  • Volume80
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency67
  • Receiving32
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)75th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (75th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs USC (SP+ 9).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7600.76Wk 1 vs Boise State: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Michigan State: +0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs California: +0.67 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Arizona: +0.41 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Oregon: +0.22 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona State: -0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Stanford: +0.10 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs USC: +0.76 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Utah: +0.25 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Oregon State: -0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington State: +0.40 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon: +0.34 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBoise StateW56-195.97121.713200-0.02
3@Michigan StateW41-7-6.88718.900.35
4vsCaliforniaW59-32-0.110666.611900.67
5@ArizonaW31-2414.116915.7254800.41
7vsOregonW36-3326.2201005.0121000.22
8vsArizona StateW15-7-11.3860.80290-0.15
9@StanfordW42-33-11.918844.710.10
10@USCW52-429.4262569.8421100.76
11vsUtahW35-288.5231044.5122800.25
12@Oregon StateW22-2012.616895.60-0.23
13vsWashington StateW24-214.921823.911600.40
14vsOregonW34-3126.2281525.421700.34
20vsMichiganL13-3431.311333.002240
20vsTexasW37-3123.221492.323180

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.1%
Passing plays
4.9%
Rushing plays
61.2%
Standard downs
32.9%
Passing downs
15.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.860−0.33
EPA per play · 2023 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.