Skip to content
DeSean Bishop

#18DeSean Bishop

DeSean Bishop is a Explosive Back for Tennessee. DeSean's 2026 season produced 14.0 total EPA across 30 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

18%
projected
band 11%'25 20%26%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So DeSean Bishop's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
244 Rush yards3 Rush TD34 Carries7.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions15 Rec yards0 Rec TD15.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume66
  • Explosiveness84
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving16
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Peak game: 0.44 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Furman.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4400.44Wk 1 vs Furman: +0.44 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia Tech: +0.42 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFurmanW56-914976.910.44
2@Georgia TechW45-241.7201477.4211500.42

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.2%
Passing plays
2.0%
Rushing plays
35.6%
Standard downs
24.3%
Passing downs
20.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.53
Passing downs
0.27
Pass / Rush EPA
1.83 / 0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.910−0.13
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.