Skip to content
De'Zhaun Stribling
De'Zhaun Stribling

#1De'Zhaun Stribling

De'Zhaun Stribling is a Slot Specialist WR for Ole Miss. De'Zhaun's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 68 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So De'Zhaun Stribling's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
55 Receptions811 Rec yards6 Rec TD14.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency76
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.70 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.95 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Mississippi State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9501.95Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +0.62 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kentucky: +0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas: +0.42 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulane: +0.64 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs LSU: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Washington State: -0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia: +1.33 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma: +0.97 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Carolina: +1.30 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs The Citadel: +0.08 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: +1.37 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Mississippi State: +1.95 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsGeorgia StateW63-7-24.535518.30370.62
2@KentuckyW30-231.8199.0090.30
3vsArkansasW41-355.1263.0160.42
4vsTulaneW45-106.336220.70530.64
5vsLSUW24-1910.32147.00120.15
7vsWashington StateW24-213.866310.5019-0.13
8@GeorgiaL35-4324.139632.01751.33
9@OklahomaW34-2618.333210.70140.97
10vsSouth CarolinaW30-145.923015.00171.30
11vsThe CitadelW49-05244.8070.08
12vsFloridaW34-243.547619.01431.37
14@Mississippi StateW38-194.146616.52231.95
20vsGeorgiaW39-3424.1712217.4040
20vsMiamiL27-3120.757715.4021
20vsTulaneW41-106.357915.8130

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.7%
Passing plays
13.8%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.8%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
1.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.83 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.