Skip to content
David Blough

#11David Blough

QB·Purdue·201820167.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

David Blough is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Purdue. David's 2018 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 491 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So David Blough's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
305/462 Comp/Att3705 Pass yards25 Pass TD10 INT66.0% Comp %
Rushing
51 Rush yards3 Rush TD76 Carries0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat63
  • Consistency68
  • Clutch95
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Iowa (SP+ 13).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 1 vs Northwestern: +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Missouri: +0.54 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Boston College: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Nebraska: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Illinois: +0.56 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ohio State: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Michigan State: +0.10 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Iowa: +0.60 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Minnesota: -0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wisconsin: +0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Indiana: +0.35 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Auburn: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNorthwesternL27-311.912/1674001900.13
2vsEastern MichiganL19-20-2.06/104800170-0.23
3vsMissouriL37-4020.839/55572311810.54
4vsBoston CollegeW30-132.421/2829630-2800.25
5@NebraskaW42-285.425/42328103810.38
7@IllinoisW46-7-7.925/3637731-1500.56
8vsOhio StateW49-2024.125/4337830-700.51
9@Michigan StateL13-2311.529/49277031200.10
10vsIowaW38-3613.323/32333422800.60
11@MinnesotaL10-416.320/3114210-140-0.07
12vsWisconsinL44-4715.531/4838640-1800.07
13@IndianaW28-211.627/3531031-1800.35
1vsAuburnL14-6323.622/37184021910.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.9%
Passing plays
91.0%
Rushing plays
13.7%
Standard downs
49.0%
Passing downs
76.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.680−0.322018
EPA per play · 2016 — 2018 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Purdue
4.8
202.1
2018Purdue
7.4
245.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.