Skip to content
Dallas Elliott

#17Dallas Elliott

Dallas Elliott is a Versatile WR for Massachusetts.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dallas Elliott's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
3 Receptions32 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume8
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down11
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Iowa (SP+ 20).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6600.66Wk 3 vs Iowa: +0.60 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Western Michigan: -0.02 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Central Michigan: -0.51 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Northern Illinois: -0.66 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
3@IowaL7-4719.7188.0080.60
6vsWestern MichiganL3-21-1.411414.0014-0.02
8vsBuffaloL21-28-7.5
9@Central MichiganL13-38-8.8-0.51
12vsNorthern IllinoisL3-45-16.711010.0010-0.66

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.8%
Passing plays
4.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.5%
Passing downs
3.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.40
Passing downs
-0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.50 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.