Skip to content
Cortez Braham

Cortez Braham

Cortez Braham is a Slot Specialist WR for Memphis. Cortez's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 87 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cortez Braham's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
63 Receptions889 Rec yards8 Rec TD14.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume31
  • Explosiveness47
  • Consistency83
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.79 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.21 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Chattanooga.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.2102.21Wk 1 vs Chattanooga: +2.21 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +2.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: +1.37 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas: +1.23 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: +1.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.79 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UAB: +0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Florida: +0.96 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Rice: +1.78 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulane: +0.51 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs East Carolina: +0.59 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Navy: +0.36 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsChattanoogaW45-1035217.31252.21
2@Georgia StateW38-16-24.523216.00212.08
3@TroyW28-7-4.846917.30301.37
4vsArkansasW32-315.1710214.61381.23
5@Florida AtlanticW55-26-8.7612721.22731.43
6vsTulsaW45-7-10.022613.01140.79
8@UABL24-31-15.858316.60300.18
9vsSouth FloridaW34-3111.677510.72180.96
10@RiceW38-14-14.836622.00301.78
11vsTulaneL32-386.31111310.30320.51
12@East CarolinaL27-318.09798.80190.59
14vsNavyL17-286.246516.31380.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.7%
Passing plays
21.8%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
8.4%
Passing downs
15.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
1.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.85 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.