Skip to content
Cole Tabb

#3Cole Tabb

Cole Tabb is a Committee Back for Stanford. Cole's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 112 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cole Tabb's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
445 Rush yards3 Rush TD114 Carries3.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions22 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns66 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume46
  • Explosiveness18
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving20
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs North Carolina (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 3 vs Boston College: -0.16 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Virginia: +0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs San José State: +0.08 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs SMU: +0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida State: +0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Miami: -0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Pittsburgh: -0.57 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs North Carolina: +0.60 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs California: -0.43 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Notre Dame: -0.24 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0@Hawai'iL20-231.74266.50280
3vsBoston CollegeW30-20-8.57314.40-0.16
4@VirginiaL20-4811.17273.900.09
5vsSan José StateW30-29-14.312484.010.08
7@SMUL10-3413.49626.9011200.16
8vsFlorida StateW20-137.2281184.210.04
9@MiamiL7-4220.719643.40-0.15
10vsPittsburghL20-358.4930.30-0.57
11@North CarolinaL15-20-6.64328.010.60
13vsCaliforniaW31-10-3.2420.50-0.43
14vsNotre DameL20-4924.411322.90120-0.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.2%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
33.9%
Standard downs
22.2%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.08
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.20 / -0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Cole Tabb Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Stanford · Gridpex