Skip to content
Chaston Ditta

#9Chaston Ditta

Chaston Ditta is a Volume Passer for East Carolina.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chaston Ditta's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
12/24 Comp/Att215 Pass yards3 Pass TD0 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
-13 Rush yards0 Rush TD14 Carries-0.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume34
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch0
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Campbell.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8000.80Wk 2 vs Campbell: +0.80 EPA/play2Wk 11 vs Charlotte: -0.36 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs UTSA: -0.45 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsCampbellW56-33/4361096.40.80
11vsCharlotteW48-22-26.70/20000.360-0.36
13@UTSAL24-583.71/12001.6-20-0.45
20vsPittsburghW23-178.48/171772029.7-170

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.0%
Passing plays
19.0%
Rushing plays
6.0%
Standard downs
10.3%
Passing downs
16.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
-0.69
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.05 / -0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.