Skip to content
Chance Morrow

#6Chance Morrow

Chance Morrow is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Buffalo. Chance's 2026 season produced 24.2 total EPA across 31 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

7%
projected
band 4%'25 7%11%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chance Morrow's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
18 Receptions221 Rec yards5 Rec TD12.3 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

14
Targets
10.9y
Avg depth
-2.1y
After catch
50%
Catch rate

The ball travels 10.9 yards in the air on an average target 1.9 yards deeper than the median. Another -2.1 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 7y
1
0% · 0y
0
short
5
60% · 26y
1
0% · 0y
6
50% · 15y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume58
  • Explosiveness35
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.83 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Florida International (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8300.83Wk 1 vs UAlbany: +0.72 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida International: +0.83 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsUAlbanyW21-177486.93110.72
2@Florida InternationalL20-33-13.51117315.72570.83

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.3%
Passing plays
34.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
17.2%
Passing downs
25.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.51
Passing downs
1.07
Pass / Rush EPA
0.78 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.