Skip to content
Cade McNamara

#11Cade McNamara

QB·Iowa·2024

Cade McNamara is a Dual-Threat QB for Iowa. Cade's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 176 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cade McNamara's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
104/172 Comp/Att1017 Pass yards6 Pass TD5 INT60.5% Comp %
Rushing
-31 Rush yards0 Rush TD13 Carries-2.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat57
  • Consistency46
  • Clutch46
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Illinois State.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 1 vs Illinois State: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa State: -0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: +0.22 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Minnesota: -0.13 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Ohio State: +0.05 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Washington: +0.17 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Northwestern: +0.26 EPA/play9
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsIllinois StateW40-021/312513052.61200.67
2vsIowa StateL19-2010.313/2999029.7-40-0.25
3vsTroyW38-21-6.619/231760046.9-1300.22
4@MinnesotaW31-1410.411/19620029.3-130-0.13
6@Ohio StateL7-3531.214/20980159.4-700.05
7vsWashingtonW40-163.18/141082072.4-1200.17
8@Michigan StateL20-32-4.611/231501163.7600.15
9vsNorthwesternW40-14-8.27/13730119.80.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.8%
Passing plays
91.1%
Rushing plays
2.1%
Standard downs
27.4%
Passing downs
65.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.17
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.