Skip to content
Bryson Washington
Bryson Washington

#30Bryson Washington

Bryson Washington is a Committee Back for Baylor. Bryson's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 169 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bryson Washington's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
788 Rush yards6 Rush TD154 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions93 Rec yards1 Rec TD5.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume53
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency44
  • Receiving50
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency44th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Houston (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5200.52Wk 1 vs Auburn: -0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SMU: -0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Samford: +0.50 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona State: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kansas State: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs TCU: -0.16 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Cincinnati: +0.06 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UCF: -0.28 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Utah: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: +0.13 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Houston: +0.52 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAuburnL24-3811.614543.90220-0.06
2@SMUW48-4513.4311153.723110-0.09
3vsSamfordW42-7211356.4211100.50
4vsArizona StateL24-273.9171116.5031700.27
5@Oklahoma StateW45-27-15.110777.710.28
6vsKansas StateW35-347.09657.2021810.15
8@TCUL36-428.311232.11110-0.16
9@CincinnatiL20-414.57233.3021500.06
10vsUCFW30-3-1.29212.303180-0.28
12vsUtahL28-5522.214976.900.23
13@ArizonaL17-4112.09515.701000.13
14vsHoustonL24-317.42168.000.52

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.7%
Passing plays
5.1%
Rushing plays
38.7%
Standard downs
20.8%
Passing downs
13.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.05
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.03 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.29
EPA per play · 2024 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.