Skip to content
Broc Lowry

#12Broc Lowry

Broc Lowry is a Dual-Threat QB for Western Michigan. Broc's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 432 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Broc Lowry's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
166/262 Comp/Att1803 Pass yards9 Pass TD3 INT63.4% Comp %
Rushing
963 Rush yards14 Rush TD203 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

21
Attempts
2.6y
Avg depth
3.9y
After catch
71%
Catch rate

The ball travels 2.6 yards in the air on an average throw 5.2 yards shorter than the median. Another 3.9 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
5
100% · 29y
4
50% · 16y
12
67% · 44y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat79
  • Consistency76
  • Clutch45
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Ball State (SP+ -23).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5500.55Wk 1 vs Michigan State: +0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Texas: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Illinois: +0.22 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Toledo: +0.14 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Rhode Island: +0.36 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Massachusetts: +0.35 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ball State: +0.55 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Miami (OH): +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Central Michigan: +0.07 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Ohio: +0.14 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northern Illinois: +0.34 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.37 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Miami (OH): -0.06 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Michigan StateL6-23-3.45/10910045.31900.02
2vsNorth TexasL30-3313.85/10751088.66620.08
3@IllinoisL0-3812.910/16780078.74000.22
4vsToledoW14-136.016/332010147.45020.14
5vsRhode IslandW47-1415/201431058.95210.36
6@MassachusettsW21-3-36.618/251631058.89210.35
7vsBall StateW42-0-23.023/272412071.010810.55
9@Miami (OH)L17-26-3.416/281721057.58200.15
10vsCentral MichiganW24-21-8.817/241501022.38210.07
12vsOhioW17-13-4.09/141260041.89210.14
13@Northern IllinoisW35-19-16.75/9320177.910030.34
14@Eastern MichiganW31-21-14.77/1410000-1.09220.37
15vsMiami (OH)W23-13-3.48/131110039.2650-0.06
20vsKennesaw StateW41-6-5.412/191202132.0230

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
48.4%
Passing plays
84.6%
Rushing plays
30.4%
Standard downs
44.0%
Passing downs
58.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.22
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Broc Lowry Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Western Michigan · Gridpex