Skip to content
Brendon Lewis

#2Brendon Lewis

Brendon Lewis is a Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Brendon's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 504 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brendon Lewis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
253/368 Comp/Att2673 Pass yards16 Pass TD7 INT68.8% Comp %
Rushing
660 Rush yards9 Rush TD151 Carries4.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch70
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Georgia State (SP+ -25).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 1 vs Chattanooga: +0.46 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +0.60 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: +0.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.55 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.39 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UAB: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Florida: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Rice: +0.50 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulane: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs East Carolina: +0.20 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Navy: +0.13 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsChattanoogaW45-1022/281991173.98110.46
2@Georgia StateW38-16-24.516/201960085.36810.60
3@TroyW28-7-4.817/272131048.24100.31
4vsArkansasW32-315.115/301991161.510320.27
5@Florida AtlanticW55-26-8.713/191962075.16020.55
6vsTulsaW45-7-10.022/302663276.16710.39
8@UABL24-31-15.89/10680037.31500.21
9vsSouth FloridaW34-3111.627/443072058.03500.30
10@RiceW38-14-14.818/222250091.68710.50
11vsTulaneL32-386.329/343172163.1-4100.34
12@East CarolinaL27-318.032/432091180.16110.20
14vsNavyL17-286.219/361722035.93600.13
20vsNC StateL7-314.814/251061125.6470

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.0%
Passing plays
89.8%
Rushing plays
27.6%
Standard downs
52.1%
Passing downs
70.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.60

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.630−0.17
EPA per play · 2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.