Skip to content
Braxton Woodson

#5Braxton Woodson

QB·Navy·2025

Braxton Woodson is a Dual-Threat QB for Navy. Braxton's 2025 season ranks in the 90th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 62 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braxton Woodson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
9/19 Comp/Att110 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT47.4% Comp %
Rushing
414 Rush yards6 Rush TD44 Carries9.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume38
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency72
  • Clutch49
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.39 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.26 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Florida Atlantic (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.2602.26Wk 1 vs VMI: +1.20 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Tulsa: -0.08 EPA/play3Wk 9 vs Florida Atlantic: +2.26 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Notre Dame: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Florida: +0.82 EPA/play12Wk 16 vs Army: +0.65 EPA/play16
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsVMIW52-73/7260099.918021.20
3@TulsaW42-23-10.0140-0.08
9vsFlorida AtlanticW42-32-8.71/12300100.01612.26
11@Notre DameL10-4924.43/8220056.610110.14
12vsSouth FloridaW41-3811.62/3390099.910320.82
16vsArmyW17-160.80.65
20vsCincinnatiW35-134.500

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.4%
Passing plays
21.4%
Rushing plays
11.6%
Standard downs
11.0%
Passing downs
20.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.44
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.16 / 0.61

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.