Skip to content
Brady White

#3Brady White

QB·Memphis·2020201911.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Brady White is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Brady's 2019 season ranks in the 85th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 471 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brady White's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
269/421 Comp/Att4014 Pass yards33 Pass TD11 INT63.9% Comp %
Rushing
-71 Rush yards4 Rush TD61 Carries-1.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency85
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat58
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)85th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (85th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.09 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Southern.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0901.09Wk 1 vs Ole Miss: +0.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southern: +1.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Alabama: +0.52 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Navy: +0.59 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UL Monroe: +0.48 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Temple: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulane: +0.90 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Tulsa: +0.77 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs SMU: +0.28 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Houston: +0.96 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Florida: +0.31 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Cincinnati: +0.50 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Cincinnati: +0.28 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Penn State: +0.21 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsOle MissW15-102.923/311720133.0-610.04
2vsSouthernW55-2417/213372096.4101.09
3@South AlabamaW42-6-20.312/202093184.8-500.52
5vsNavyW35-239.914/181963070.8-1900.59
6@UL MonroeW52-33-10.715/232493173.8-500.48
7@TempleL28-303.228/433632151.6-700.34
8vsTulaneW47-177.521/293585096.1-700.90
9@TulsaW42-41-2.515/252772093.0500.77
10vsSMUW54-484.419/3335030-1400.28
12@HoustonW45-27-4.322/3334151710.96
13@South FloridaW49-10-9.818/2822222400.31
14vsCincinnatiW34-249.115/26233211400.50
15vsCincinnatiW29-249.118/4025311-1610.28
1vsPenn StateL39-5324.332/5145402-2310.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.5%
Passing plays
95.9%
Rushing plays
7.2%
Standard downs
41.5%
Passing downs
60.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.75
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.190−0.062020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Memphis
11.9
289.9
2020Memphis
8.3
225.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.