Skip to content
Blaze Berlowitz

#1Blaze Berlowitz

Blaze Berlowitz is a Clutch Passer for Vanderbilt.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Blaze Berlowitz's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
9/17 Comp/Att131 Pass yards1 Pass TD0 INT52.9% Comp %
Rushing
81 Rush yards1 Rush TD11 Carries7.4 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

16
Attempts
8.2y
Avg depth
8.5y
After catch
69%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.2 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 8.5 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
2
50% · 31y
short
3
100% · 55y
4
75% · 33y
7
57% · 30y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume21
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency32
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency32th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Charleston Southern: +0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia Tech: +1.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Carolina: -0.56 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia State: +1.14 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah State: -0.32 EPA/play5Wk 13 vs Kentucky: +0.23 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsCharleston SouthernW45-31/350034.61300.05
2@Virginia TechW44-20-10.12/2351097.9-301.27
3@South CarolinaW31-75.90/100037.700-0.56
4vsGeorgia StateW70-21-24.52/5360098.76311.14
5vsUtah StateW55-35-3.10/10001.6-0.32
13vsKentuckyW45-171.84/5550064.2800.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.4%
Passing plays
9.5%
Rushing plays
5.3%
Standard downs
5.5%
Passing downs
13.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.39
Passing downs
1.64
Pass / Rush EPA
1.15 / -0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.