Skip to content
Austin Jones

#6Austin Jones

RB·USC·2023

Austin Jones is a Explosive Back for USC. Austin's 2023 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 99 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Austin Jones's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
477 Rush yards7 Rush TD85 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions103 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency37
  • Receiving46
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency37th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Washington (SP+ 16).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8700.87Wk 1 vs Nevada: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Stanford: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Arizona State: +0.33 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado: +0.16 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arizona: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Notre Dame: -0.46 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Utah: +0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs California: +0.42 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington: +0.87 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oregon: -0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UCLA: -0.49 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsSan José StateW56-28-3.46549.02
1vsNevadaW66-14-22.02199.500.45
2vsStanfordW56-10-11.96335.5121400.44
4@Arizona StateW42-28-11.333612.000.33
5@ColoradoW48-41-4.9362.0012400.16
6vsArizonaW43-4114.15153.0121600.17
7@Notre DameL20-4820.111272.50-0.46
8vsUtahL32-348.55316.200.18
9@CaliforniaW50-49-0.19374.1121410.42
10vsWashingtonL42-5216.41112711.500.87
11@OregonL27-3626.27263.71180-0.06
12vsUCLAL20-389.7661.01130-0.49
20vsLouisvilleW42-288.011605.504240

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.2%
Passing plays
3.1%
Rushing plays
25.4%
Standard downs
13.6%
Passing downs
9.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.