Skip to content
Ashten Emory

#20Ashten Emory

RB·UTEP·2025

Ashten Emory is a Explosive Back for UTEP. Ashten's 2025 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 131 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ashten Emory's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
569 Rush yards4 Rush TD119 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions103 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume49
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving43
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.78 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Utah State (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7800.78Wk 1 vs Utah State: +0.78 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UT Martin: +0.54 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas: -0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UL Monroe: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.21 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Liberty: -0.69 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Sam Houston: +0.06 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kennesaw State: -0.20 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Jacksonville State: +0.41 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Missouri State: +0.24 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs New Mexico State: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Delaware: -0.14 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Utah StateL16-28-3.16315.211900.78
2vsUT MartinW42-1710363.6122020.54
3@TexasL10-2716.21150.504120-0.47
4vsUL MonroeL25-31-21.66193.20-0.01
5vsLouisiana TechL11-30-1.311504.5011000.21
7vsLibertyL8-19-9.0100.00-0.69
8vsSam HoustonW35-17-27.815966.4122200.06
10@Kennesaw StateL20-33-5.410303.00260-0.20
11vsJacksonville StateL27-30-6.710373.701500.41
12@Missouri StateL24-38-10.79556.100.24
13vsNew Mexico StateL31-34-15.51818110.1121100.32
14@DelawareL31-61-10.912292.40180-0.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.0%
Passing plays
4.0%
Rushing plays
34.1%
Standard downs
18.8%
Passing downs
13.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.