Skip to content
Angel H Flores

Angel H Flores

Angel H Flores is a Dual-Threat QB for Central Michigan. Angel's 2026 season produced 1.8 total EPA across 45 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

32%
projected
band 14%'25 25%50%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Angel H Flores's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
10/19 Comp/Att71 Pass yards0 Pass TD2 INT52.6% Comp %
Rushing
149 Rush yards1 Rush TD32 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat82
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch52
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2400.24Wk 1 vs New Mexico: -0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Colgate: +0.18 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@New MexicoL7-384.43/6140125.5270-0.24
2vsColgateW13-107/13570112210.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.5%
Passing plays
50.0%
Rushing plays
43.5%
Standard downs
42.9%
Passing downs
50.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.01
Passing downs
0.07
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.13 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.