Skip to content
Alessio Milivojevic
Alessio Milivojevic

#11Alessio Milivojevic

Alessio Milivojevic is a Dual-Threat QB for Michigan State. Alessio's 2026 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 67 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

39%
projected
band 21%'25 41%57%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Alessio Milivojevic's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
38/54 Comp/Att417 Pass yards3 Pass TD0 INT70.4% Comp %
Rushing
9 Rush yards0 Rush TD13 Carries0.7 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

34
Attempts
8.1y
Avg depth
2.2y
After catch
76%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.1 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 2.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
1
0% · 0y
short
15
80% · 104y
6
50% · 21y
12
92% · 122y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch56
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.36 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Toledo (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3600.36Wk 1 vs Toledo: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.32 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsToledoW30-20-9.426/342471087.3-500.36
2vsEastern MichiganW35-7-15.612/20170201400.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
42.4%
Passing plays
90.6%
Rushing plays
10.0%
Standard downs
31.9%
Passing downs
74.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.39
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.53

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.