Skip to content
AJ Surace

#10AJ Surace

AJ Surace is a Volume Passer for Rutgers. AJ's 2026 season produced 2.1 total EPA across 35 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

24%
projected
band 6%'25 7%42%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So AJ Surace's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
24/36 Comp/Att307 Pass yards4 Pass TD4 INT66.7% Comp %
Rushing
-18 Rush yards0 Rush TD8 Carries-2.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume96
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch51
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Massachusetts (SP+ -26).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6900.69Wk 1 vs Massachusetts: +0.69 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boston College: -0.01 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMassachusettsL21-37-25.86/9771090.9-200.69
2@Boston CollegeL21-28-7.418/2723034-160-0.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
33.6%
Passing plays
53.6%
Rushing plays
8.5%
Standard downs
30.1%
Passing downs
42.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.04
Passing downs
0.10
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / -0.97

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.