Skip to content

UTEP vs. Air Force Prediction, Odds & Pick

Prediction, odds and the model's read

Falcon StadiumConference game

Our model's read

Model win probability
AF 93%
Model line
AF −22.5
Gridpex modelUTEP 7% · AF 93%
Pick Air ForceModel line AF −22.5

Scouting report

2026 projection · last season, roster and staff

Where UTEP gets at Air Force: 1st at hitting chunk plays, against a unit 129th at keeping everything in front of them. Where Air Force gets at UTEP: 16th at keeping a clean pocket, against a unit 98th at generating havoc. Air Force is also 37th at throwing it, against a unit 89th.

HowUTEPattacksAF

  • 1

    Take shots

    hitting chunk plays · projected

    UTEP
    #1 of 138
    AF
    #129 of 138

HowAFattacksUTEP

  • 1

    Expect a clean pocket

    sacks and tackles for loss · projected

    AF
    #16 of 138
    UTEP
    #98 of 138
  • 2

    Throw it

    throwing it · projected

    AF
    #37 of 138
    UTEP
    #89 of 138
  • 3

    Expect clean run lanes

    getting stopped at the line · projected

    AF
    #3 of 138
    UTEP
    #38 of 138

The two teams

UTEP

UTEP is in year 3 under Scotty Walden. The strengths are on both sides of the ball, led by 1st at hitting chunk plays. The way in is 137th on first and second down, and they are 137th in the push up front.

UTEP has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #1
    projected
  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #25
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensefirst and second down
    #137
    projected
  • Offensethe push the line gets
    #137
    projected
  • Offensethrowing it
    #136
    projected

Air Force

heavily run-leaning

Air Force runs it: Troy Calhoun's offenses have been heavily run-leaning across 11 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 3rd at staying out of the backfield. The way in is 138th at defending the pass, and they are 138th at defending the run.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+1.3%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −27.7% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Air Force has not played an FBS opponent yet, so this is the projection: last season regressed toward the mean, plus returning production, recruiting, talent and whether the staff is the same one.

Projected strengths

  • Offensegetting stopped at the line
    #3
    projected
  • Offensesacks and tackles for loss
    #16
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensethrowing it
    #138
    projected
  • Defenserunning it
    #138
    projected
  • Defensesurviving second and twelve
    #138
    projected

Ranks are national. Nothing here is last season's number — carrying one forward is measurably worse than saying nothing — and in-season figures are adjusted for who was actually played. This describes the matchup; it is not a prediction and not a pick.

Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

Pregame line
Pregame total
Model line
AF −22.5
Projected total

Model prediction

how the number is built
Power rating (Elo)
AF 1416
UTEP 1163
Projected spread
AF -22.5
incl. home edge
Model pick
AF
93% to win
Market spread
sportsbook line
Model vs market
Agrees
aligned w/ market
Win prob: model / mkt
93%
AF (no market)

Our model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (AF Elo 1416, UTEP Elo 1163 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects AF -22.5 (93% to win), essentially in line with the market.

Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).

Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation

Where the game is won

2026 national rank · right is better

offensethe defense it faces

  • Moving the ball

    UTEP61st51stAF
    AF82nd71stUTEP
  • Through the air

    UTEP119th23rdAF
    AF134th42ndUTEP
  • On the ground

    UTEP57th54thAF
    AF5th93rdUTEP
  • Staying on the field

    UTEP121st43rdAF
    AF30th102ndUTEP
  • Taking care of it

    UTEP77th45thAF
    AF21st45thUTEP

Each bar runs from last in the country on the left to 1st on the right. The filled span is the gap between the offense and the defense it faces.

Season form — 2026

nationally ranked
UTEP2026 season · national rank shownAF
344.5104th
Total yards / game
418.062nd
6.361st
Yards / play
5.882nd
162.5119th
Passing yards / game
99.0134th
182.057th
Rushing yards / game
319.05th
30.4%121st
3rd down %
51.7%30th
306.060th
Yards allowed / game
240.524th
42.9%102nd
3rd down % allowed
30.4%43rd
069th
Turnover margin
+224th
4.017th
Penalties / game
7.076th

The matchup, in context

series history + adjusted profiles
Opponent-adjusted profile2026
UTEP AF
-16.9 (#134)CORE overall-14.9 (#127)
-13 / +4offense / defense-1 / +14

Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.

Pro

Key matchups

The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.

Create a free account →

You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.

FAQ

Who will win UTEP vs. Air Force?

Gridpex's model favors Air Force with a 93% win probability.

What's the predicted spread for UTEP vs. Air Force?

The model projects Air Force by 22.5.

What time is UTEP vs. Air Force and what channel is it on?

Fri, Nov 20, 8:00 PM ET, at Falcon Stadium.

Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →

Model estimates for informational and entertainment purposes only. Not betting advice. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER. Data: CollegeFootballData.