UTEP vs. Air Force Prediction, Odds & Pick
Prediction, odds and the model's read
Our model's read
Scouting report
2026 projection · last season, roster and staff
Where UTEP gets at Air Force: 1st at hitting chunk plays, against a unit 129th at keeping everything in front of them. Where Air Force gets at UTEP: 16th at keeping a clean pocket, against a unit 98th at generating havoc. Air Force is also 37th at throwing it, against a unit 89th.
How
UTEPattacks
AF
- 1
Take shots
hitting chunk plays · projected
UTEP#1 of 138
AF#129 of 138
How
AFattacks
UTEP
- 1
Expect a clean pocket
sacks and tackles for loss · projected
AF#16 of 138
UTEP#98 of 138 - 2
Throw it
throwing it · projected
AF#37 of 138
UTEP#89 of 138 - 3
Expect clean run lanes
getting stopped at the line · projected
AF#3 of 138
UTEP#38 of 138
The two teams
UTEP
UTEP is in year 3 under Scotty Walden. The strengths are on both sides of the ball, led by 1st at hitting chunk plays. The way in is 137th on first and second down, and they are 137th in the push up front.
UTEP has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Offensehitting chunk plays#1projected
- Defensehitting chunk plays#25projected
Projected soft spots
- Offensefirst and second down#137projected
- Offensethe push the line gets#137projected
- Offensethrowing it#136projected
Air Force
Air Force runs it: Troy Calhoun's offenses have been heavily run-leaning across 11 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 3rd at staying out of the backfield. The way in is 138th at defending the pass, and they are 138th at defending the run.
On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+1.3%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −27.7% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
Air Force has not played an FBS opponent yet, so this is the projection: last season regressed toward the mean, plus returning production, recruiting, talent and whether the staff is the same one.
Projected strengths
- Offensegetting stopped at the line#3projected
- Offensesacks and tackles for loss#16projected
Projected soft spots
- Defensethrowing it#138projected
- Defenserunning it#138projected
- Defensesurviving second and twelve#138projected
Ranks are national. Nothing here is last season's number — carrying one forward is measurably worse than saying nothing — and in-season figures are adjusted for who was actually played. This describes the matchup; it is not a prediction and not a pick.
Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (AF Elo 1416, UTEP Elo 1163 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects AF -22.5 (93% to win), essentially in line with the market.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Where the game is won
2026 national rank · right is better
offensethe defense it faces
Moving the ball
UTEP61st51st
AF
AF82nd71st
UTEPThrough the air
UTEP119th23rd
AF
AF134th42nd
UTEPOn the ground
UTEP57th54th
AF
AF5th93rd
UTEPStaying on the field
UTEP121st43rd
AF
AF30th102nd
UTEPTaking care of it
UTEP77th45th
AF
AF21st45th
UTEP
Each bar runs from last in the country on the left to 1st on the right. The filled span is the gap between the offense and the defense it faces.
Season form — 2026
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles| UTEP | AF | |
|---|---|---|
| -16.9 (#134) | CORE overall | -14.9 (#127) |
| -13 / +4 | offense / defense | -1 / +14 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
FAQ
Who will win UTEP vs. Air Force?
Gridpex's model favors Air Force with a 93% win probability.
What's the predicted spread for UTEP vs. Air Force?
The model projects Air Force by 22.5.
What time is UTEP vs. Air Force and what channel is it on?
Fri, Nov 20, 8:00 PM ET, at Falcon Stadium.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
































