Rutgers vs. Wisconsin Prediction, Odds & Pick
Prediction, odds and the model's read
Our model's read
Scouting report
2026 projection · last season, roster and staff
Where Rutgers gets at Wisconsin: 42nd on first and second down, against a unit 111th on early downs defensively. Where Wisconsin gets at Rutgers: 48th at hitting chunk plays, against a unit 115th at keeping everything in front of them. Rutgers is also 35th at staying on schedule through the air, against a unit 86th.
How
RUTGattacks
WIS
- 1
Win first and second down
first and second down · projected
RUTG#42 of 138WIS#111 of 138 - 2
Stay on schedule through the air
staying on schedule through the air · projected
RUTG#35 of 138WIS#86 of 138 - 3
Lean on the run
moving the ball on the ground · projected
RUTG#48 of 138WIS#93 of 138
HowWISattacksRUTG
- 1
Take shots
hitting chunk plays · projected
WIS#48 of 138RUTG#115 of 138
The two teams
Rutgers
Rutgers runs it: Greg Schiano's offenses have been run-leaning across 6 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 29th at staying out of the backfield. The way in is 133rd at defending the run, and they are 128th at keeping opponents off schedule through the air.
On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+2.5%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −24.6% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
Rutgers has played 2 games against a genuinely tough slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Offensegetting stopped at the line#29projected
- Offensesurviving second and twelve#32projected
- Offensestaying on schedule through the air#35projected
Projected soft spots
- Defenserunning it#133projected
- Defensestaying on schedule through the air#128projected
- Defensefirst and second down#125projected
Wisconsin
Wisconsin is in year 4 under Luke Fickell, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 11th at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 127th at moving the ball on the ground, and they are 125th at turning trips inside the 40 into points.
On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (−0.5%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −28.5% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
Wisconsin has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Defensehitting chunk plays#11projected
- Defensegetting stopped at the line#30projected
Projected soft spots
- Offensemoving the ball on the ground#127projected
- Offenseturning trips inside the 40 into points#125projected
- Offensefirst and second down#124projected
Ranks are national. Nothing here is last season's number — carrying one forward is measurably worse than saying nothing — and in-season figures are adjusted for who was actually played. This describes the matchup; it is not a prediction and not a pick.
Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (WIS Elo 1475, RUTG Elo 1372 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects WIS -4.1 (61% to win), essentially in line with the market.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Where the game is won
2026 national rank · right is better
offensethe defense it faces
Moving the ball
RUTG95th82ndWISWIS67th124thRUTGThrough the air
RUTG39th64thWISWIS97th98thRUTGOn the ground
RUTG129th86thWISWIS85th114thRUTGStaying on the field
RUTG121st39thWISWIS69th69thRUTGTaking care of it
RUTG138th126thWISWIS49th45thRUTG
Each bar runs from last in the country on the left to 1st on the right. The filled span is the gap between the offense and the defense it faces.
Season form — 2026
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles| RUTG | WIS | |
|---|---|---|
| -10.9 (#112) | CORE overall | +0.6 (#67) |
| +1 / +12 | offense / defense | -4 / -5 |
| 1.75 | points / drive | 0.67 |
| 3.70 | allowed / drive | 3.78 |
| 50% | three-and-outs | 22% |
| +14 | pass over expected | -11 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
FAQ
Who will win Rutgers vs. Wisconsin?
Gridpex's model favors Wisconsin with a 61% win probability.
What's the predicted spread for Rutgers vs. Wisconsin?
The model projects Wisconsin by 4.1.
What time is Rutgers vs. Wisconsin and what channel is it on?
Time TBD, at Camp Randall Stadium.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →