Skip to content
Zylan Perry

#7Zylan Perry

Zylan Perry is a Committee Back for Louisiana. Zylan's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 149 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zylan Perry's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
689 Rush yards8 Rush TD138 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions101 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume55
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency27
  • Receiving60
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.32 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Missouri (SP+ 14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs Rice: -0.00 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs McNeese: +0.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Missouri: +0.94 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.37 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Marshall: -0.03 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.16 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Troy: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Alabama: -0.31 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas State: +0.13 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Arkansas State: +0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UL Monroe: -0.40 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsRiceL12-14-14.811464.20110-0.00
2vsMcNeeseW34-1014946.7011300.27
3@MissouriL10-5214.458617.210.94
4@Eastern MichiganL31-34-14.7151107.323-400.37
5vsMarshallW54-51-4.514755.422180-0.03
8vsSouthern MissL10-22-7.113554.200.16
9@TroyL23-35-4.89212.3111600.30
10@South AlabamaW31-22-12.715563.71110-0.31
11vsTexas StateW42-392.314594.201900.13
13@Arkansas StateW34-30-8.812423.5132500.12
14vsUL MonroeW30-27-21.66203.30-0.40
20vsDelawareL13-20-10.910252.503220

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.2%
Passing plays
6.3%
Rushing plays
28.9%
Standard downs
22.8%
Passing downs
11.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
0.07
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.