Skip to content
Wayshawn Parker

#1Wayshawn Parker

Wayshawn Parker is a Committee Back for Washington State.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Wayshawn Parker's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
735 Rush yards4 Rush TD137 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions100 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume54
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving28
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.98 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Utah State (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9800.98Wk 1 vs Portland State: +0.95 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Tech: +0.06 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Washington: -0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs San José State: -0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Boise State: -0.36 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Fresno State: -0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Hawai'i: -0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs San Diego State: -0.05 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Utah State: +0.98 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs New Mexico: -0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oregon State: -0.28 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wyoming: -0.20 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsPortland StateW70-3089612.0115210.95
2vsTexas TechW37-164.311696.311200.06
3vsWashingtonW24-193.110494.901160-0.08
4vsSan José StateW54-52-5.522763.50110-0.25
5@Boise StateL24-4510.111353.20-0.36
7@Fresno StateW25-17-3.812635.301-20-0.09
8vsHawai'iW42-10-10.99252.80-0.20
9@San Diego StateW29-26-15.49333.70-0.05
11vsUtah StateW49-28-10.41114913.5211000.98
12@New MexicoL35-38-14.811474.30290-0.06
13@Oregon StateL38-41-6.79485.300-30-0.28
14vsWyomingL14-15-13.614453.202150-0.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.0%
Passing plays
2.9%
Rushing plays
33.8%
Standard downs
23.4%
Passing downs
7.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.04
Passing downs
-0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / -0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.