Skip to content
Tyrone Howell

#4Tyrone Howell

Tyrone Howell is a Versatile WR for UL Monroe. Tyrone's 2023 season produced 44.7 total EPA across 49 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tyrone Howell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
49 Receptions590 Rec yards7 Rec TD12.0 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Punt returns14 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume20
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency77
  • Pass-Down92
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.42 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.64 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Georgia Southern (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6402.64Wk 1 vs Army: +0.71 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Lamar: +1.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas A&M: -0.09 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs App State: +1.21 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs South Alabama: +1.29 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas State: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia Southern: +2.64 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Arkansas State: +0.43 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Southern Miss: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Troy: +2.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ole Miss: +0.67 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Louisiana: +1.22 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsArmyW17-13-4.09677.41110.71
2vsLamarW24-1446516.30281.65
3@Texas A&ML3-4715.624020.0037-0.09
5vsApp StateL40-413.88627.83201.21
6vsSouth AlabamaL7-555.144110.31141.29
7@Texas StateL20-21-1.623819.00280.23
8@Georgia SouthernL28-38-5.234816.01212.64
9vsArkansas StateL24-34-6.35377.40100.43
10@Southern MissL7-24-14.43258.30160.21
11vsTroyL14-459.849323.31462.34
12@Ole MissL3-3518.433411.30210.67
13@LouisianaL21-520.424020.00391.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.0%
Passing plays
14.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.5%
Passing downs
8.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.81
Passing downs
1.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.91 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.