Skip to content
Trexler Ivey

#11Trexler Ivey

Trexler Ivey is a Dual-Threat QB for Charlotte. Trexler's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 53 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trexler Ivey's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
34/59 Comp/Att326 Pass yards3 Pass TD2 INT57.6% Comp %
Rushing
3 Rush yards0 Rush TD4 Carries0.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume70
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch0
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 1.48 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Gardner-Webb.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6402.64Wk 3 vs Gardner-Webb: +1.48 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Indiana: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Rice: -0.22 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Navy: -2.64 EPA/play8
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
3vsGardner-WebbW27-2611/121422093.71.48
4@IndianaL14-5220.114/231191071.7300.19
5@RiceW21-20-11.48/2154015.600-0.22
8@NavyL17-513.51/311010.1-2.64

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.5%
Passing plays
47.2%
Rushing plays
1.6%
Standard downs
17.5%
Passing downs
39.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
-0.05
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.64

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.