Skip to content
Terion Stewart
Terion Stewart

#8Terion Stewart

RB·Bowling Green·2024

Terion Stewart is a Committee Back for Bowling Green. Terion's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 162 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Terion Stewart's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
898 Rush yards6 Rush TD166 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions12 Rec yards0 Rec TD12.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume66
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency26
  • Receiving2
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency26th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • ▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Fordham.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.730−0.73Wk 1 vs Fordham: +0.73 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Texas A&M: -0.20 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Old Dominion: -0.00 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: +0.06 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kent State: +0.28 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Toledo: -0.34 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Central Michigan: +0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Western Michigan: +0.58 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ball State: +0.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Miami (OH): +0.03 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFordhamW41-17—1416111.53———0.73
4@Texas A&ML20-2617.013423.20———-0.20
5vsOld DominionL27-30-6.020673.41———-0.00
7vsNorthern IllinoisL7-17-3.513644.90———0.06
8vsKent StateW27-6-33.0251245.00———0.28
9@ToledoW41-26-2.521994.71———-0.34
11@Central MichiganW23-13-15.8201175.90———0.10
12vsWestern MichiganW31-13-10.21515010.0111200.58
13@Ball StateW38-13-19.810323.20———0.02
14vsMiami (OH)L12-281.39343.80———0.03
20vsArkansas StateL31-38-9.9681.30————

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.0%
Passing plays
0.3%
Rushing plays
47.8%
Standard downs
27.9%
Passing downs
12.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.02
Passing downs
0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
1.93 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Terion Stewart Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Bowling Green · Gridpex