#3Taisun Phommachanh

QB·Massachusetts·2024

Taisun Phommachanh is a Dual-Threat QB for Massachusetts. Taisun's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 310 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Taisun Phommachanh's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing

132/234 Comp/Att1590 Pass yards8 Pass TD6 INT56.4% Comp %

Rushing

317 Rush yards3 Rush TD107 Carries3.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat99
Consistency69
Clutch87

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Central Connecticut.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsEastern Michigan	L14-28	-13.3	20/30	177	0	0	33.7	57	0	0.06
2	@Toledo	L23-38	-2.5	26/40	259	1	1	44.1	44	1	0.20
3	@Buffalo	L3-34	-4.0	14/29	121	0	1	12.4	2	0	0.34
4	vsCentral Connecticut	W35-31	—	20/30	287	3	1	68.3	43	0	0.76
5	@Miami (OH)	L20-23	1.3	9/22	173	1	0	65.8	80	0	0.27
6	@Northern Illinois	L20-34	-3.5	15/30	263	2	0	49.3	27	0	0.18
7	vsMissouri	L3-45	14.0	12/22	132	0	1	22.0	-1	0	0.00
9	vsWagner	W35-7	—	10/18	129	1	1	21.7	30	2	0.67
10	@Mississippi State	L20-45	-4.1	6/13	49	0	1	28.9	35	0	-0.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

53.8%

Passing plays

88.6%

Rushing plays

24.6%

Standard downs

44.6%

Passing downs

72.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.17
Passing downs: 0.41
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.23 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).