Skip to content
Savion Williams

#3Savion Williams

WR·TCU·20241.1 pts line value1st Round

Savion Williams is a Versatile WR for TCU. Savion's 2024 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 125 plays — a above-average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Savion Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
322 Rush yards6 Rush TD51 Carries6.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
60 Receptions611 Rec yards6 Rec TD10.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume44
  • Explosiveness21
  • Consistency83
  • Pass-Down89
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (88th percentile).
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.54 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Houston (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Zach AbeyNavy0.3702.146.6
Kendall HintonWake Forest0.4602.438.6
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Kawaan BakerSouth Alabama0.4101.425.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5401.54Wk 1 vs Stanford: +0.23 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Long Island University: +1.06 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCF: +0.37 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs SMU: +1.35 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas: +0.40 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Houston: +1.54 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Utah: +0.72 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas Tech: +0.88 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Baylor: +0.76 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oklahoma State: +0.78 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Arizona: +1.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Cincinnati: +0.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@StanfordW34-27-8.211857.71170.23
2vsLong Island UniversityW45-056913.80261.06
3vsUCFL34-352.84379.32180.37
4@SMUL42-6617.535016.70221.35
5vsKansasW38-274.944711.80260.40
6vsHoustonL19-30-8.244010.01211.54
8@UtahW13-77.75275.40100.72
9vsTexas TechW35-344.338127.01750.88
10@BaylorL34-378.489211.50280.76
11vsOklahoma StateW38-13-2.67527.41160.78
13vsArizonaW49-28-2.83165.30191.12
14@CincinnatiW20-13-0.13155.0070.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.4%
Passing plays
16.5%
Rushing plays
14.2%
Standard downs
16.7%
Passing downs
12.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.62
Passing downs
0.85
Pass / Rush EPA
0.74 / 0.58

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.690−0.10
EPA per play · 2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.