Skip to content
Phillip Ely

#12Phillip Ely

QB·Toledo·20158.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Phillip Ely is a Clutch Passer for Toledo. Phillip's 2015 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 381 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Phillip Ely's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
226/403 Comp/Att2965 Pass yards23 Pass TD10 INT56.1% Comp %
Rushing
16 Rush yards1 Rush TD26 Carries0.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat14
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.82 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Eastern Michigan (SP+ -20).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa State: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas State: +0.20 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ball State: +0.48 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kent State: +0.46 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.82 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Massachusetts: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Northern Illinois: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Central Michigan: +0.46 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Bowling Green: +0.59 EPA/play12Wk 1 vs Temple: +0.60 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2@ArkansasW16-1219.221/382371056.2300.25
3vsIowa StateW30-23-0.311/28138118.3800.10
4vsArkansas StateW37-70.525/523080136.5500.20
5@Ball StateW24-10-15.516/221642268.6400.48
6vsKent StateW38-7-11.919/322052052.51300.46
7vsEastern MichiganW63-20-19.718/273274076.3-800.82
8@MassachusettsW51-35-9.526/473555367.1600.35
10vsNorthern IllinoisL27-32-0.915/331361211.5-300.06
11@Central MichiganW28-23-3.123/393222076.6-300.46
12@Bowling GreenW44-287.516/242081189.0-110.59
13vsWestern MichiganL30-354.916/332802064.800
1vsTempleW32-176.020/282852074.1-800.60

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.4%
Passing plays
97.9%
Rushing plays
4.5%
Standard downs
36.3%
Passing downs
67.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / -0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.900−0.02
EPA per play · 2015 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.