Skip to content
Payton Thorne

#1Payton Thorne

QB·Michigan State·202420219.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Payton Thorne is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Michigan State. Payton's 2021 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 437 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Payton Thorne's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
235/389 Comp/Att3240 Pass yards27 Pass TD10 INT60.4% Comp %
Rushing
181 Rush yards4 Rush TD82 Carries2.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Youngstown State.

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8700.87Wk 1 vs Northwestern: +0.38 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Youngstown State: +0.87 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Miami: +0.45 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: +0.55 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Rutgers: +0.72 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Indiana: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Michigan: +0.26 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Purdue: +0.35 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Maryland: +0.48 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ohio State: -0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Penn State: +0.82 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Pittsburgh: +0.28 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@NorthwesternW38-21-11.115/251851076.22800.38
2vsYoungstown StateW42-1415/212804088.41910.87
3@MiamiW38-1710.818/312614088.0400.45
4vsNebraskaW23-2010.314/231831139.9-500.27
5vsWestern KentuckyW48-3113.320/303271091.13110.55
6@RutgersW31-13-3.016/273393194.4900.72
7@IndianaW20-15-7.814/261261220.71000.26
9vsMichiganW37-3323.419/301960248.4000.26
10@PurdueL29-4010.320/302762191.14710.35
11vsMarylandW40-216.222/302874190.5400.48
12@Ohio StateL7-5629.314/361581026.3-90-0.07
13vsPenn StateW30-2714.319/302682194.93910.82
1vsPittsburghW31-2117.629/503543178.3400.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.1%
Passing plays
95.9%
Rushing plays
13.7%
Standard downs
45.2%
Passing downs
70.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.46

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.230−0.182024
EPA per play · 2021 — 2024 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Michigan State
9.4
261.0
2024Auburn
5.9
179.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.