#0Omiri Wiggins

RB·Louisiana Tech·2025

Omiri Wiggins is a Committee Back for Louisiana Tech. Omiri's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 107 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Omiri Wiggins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

468 Rush yards4 Rush TD97 Carries4.8 Yards/carry

Receiving

11 Receptions61 Rec yards1 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec

Returns

1 Kick returns9 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume40
Explosiveness36
Consistency0
Receiving59

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.17 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Sam Houston (SP+ -28).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsSE Louisiana	W24-0	—	4	1	0.3	0	1	17	1	-0.50
2	@LSU	L7-23	10.3	3	3	1.0	0	1	1	0	-0.68
3	vsNew Mexico State	W49-14	-15.5	15	68	4.5	1	—	—	—	0.19
4	vsSouthern Miss	W30-20	-7.1	12	49	4.1	1	2	7	0	0.03
5	@UTEP	W30-11	-17.5	9	37	4.1	0	—	—	—	-0.03
7	@Kennesaw State	L7-35	-5.4	14	67	4.8	1	2	11	0	0.45
9	vsWestern Kentucky	L27-28	1.6	3	1	0.3	0	2	12	0	-0.18
10	vsSam Houston	W55-14	-27.8	14	136	9.7	1	—	—	—	0.73
11	@Delaware	L24-25	-10.9	9	42	4.7	0	2	6	0	-0.19
12	@Washington State	L3-28	3.8	4	11	2.8	0	—	—	—	-0.39
13	vsLiberty	W34-28	-9.0	5	14	2.8	0	1	7	0	0.13
14	@Missouri State	W42-30	-10.7	5	39	7.8	0	—	—	—	0.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

13.9%

Passing plays

4.5%

Rushing plays

20.6%

Standard downs

16.3%

Passing downs

7.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.02
Passing downs: 0.31
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.20 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).