Skip to content
Maverick McIvor
Maverick McIvor

#7Maverick McIvor

QB·Western Kentucky·2025

Maverick McIvor is a Dual-Threat QB for Western Kentucky. Maverick's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 292 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Maverick McIvor's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
183/273 Comp/Att2062 Pass yards12 Pass TD6 INT67.0% Comp %
Rushing
76 Rush yards2 Rush TD39 Carries1.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency56
  • Clutch69
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • ▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs North Alabama.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.800−0.80Wk 1 vs North Alabama: +0.80 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Toledo: -0.22 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Nevada: +0.11 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Missouri State: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Delaware: +0.49 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida International: -0.10 EPA/play8
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsSam HoustonW41-24-27.833/514013069.471—
1vsNorth AlabamaW55-6—24/313055090.6700.80
2@ToledoL21-456.023/382352125.0-140-0.22
4vsNevadaW31-16-13.422/332160127.3-1500.11
5@Missouri StateW27-22-10.726/393171053.5-500.38
6@DelawareW27-24-10.923/312301073.63600.49
8vsFlorida InternationalL6-25-10.520/311590317.0120-0.10
20vsSouthern MissW27-16-7.112/191990193.7481—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
56.5%
Passing plays
87.8%
Rushing plays
13.0%
Standard downs
51.8%
Passing downs
65.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.35
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.