Skip to content
Makhi Frazier

#25Makhi Frazier

Makhi Frazier is a Committee Back for Michigan State. Makhi's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 132 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Makhi Frazier's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
520 Rush yards2 Rush TD116 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions25 Rec yards0 Rec TD2.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume68
  • Explosiveness30
  • Consistency15
  • Receiving40
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency15th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.35 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Western Michigan (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3800.38Wk 1 vs Western Michigan: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boston College: -0.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Youngstown State: -0.38 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs USC: -0.02 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Nebraska: -0.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCLA: +0.20 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Indiana: -0.31 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Michigan: +0.13 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Penn State: -0.31 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWestern MichiganW23-6-1.4141037.411-500.35
2vsBoston CollegeW42-40-8.517814.80110-0.33
3vsYoungstown StateW41-2412221.811-60-0.38
4@USCL31-4516.914614.40120-0.02
6@NebraskaL27-386.218583.204170-0.14
7vsUCLAL13-38-8.712584.800.20
8@IndianaL13-3832.4710.104160-0.31
9vsMichiganL20-3112.4141097.800.13
12vsPenn StateL10-2818.18273.40-0.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.8%
Passing plays
5.2%
Rushing plays
44.3%
Standard downs
27.5%
Passing downs
15.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.14
Passing downs
0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.23 / -0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Makhi Frazier Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Michigan State · Gridpex