Skip to content
Lakota Dippre
Lakota Dippre

Lakota Dippre

TE·James Madison·2025

Lakota Dippre is a Versatile TE for James Madison.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Lakota Dippre's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
17 Receptions192 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns7 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness29
  • Consistency71
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 3.05 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Georgia Southern (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.050−3.05Wk 2 vs Louisville: +0.73 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Liberty: +1.58 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia Southern: +3.05 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Georgia State: +0.94 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Louisiana: -0.18 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Old Dominion: +0.42 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs App State: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington State: +0.35 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Coastal Carolina: +2.70 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2@LouisvilleL14-2812.4133.0130.73
4@LibertyW31-13-9.024321.50361.58
5vsGeorgia SouthernW35-10-9.424221.01253.05
6@Georgia StateW14-7-24.53196.30110.94
7vsLouisianaW24-14-10.1177.007-0.18
8vsOld DominionW63-275.92189.00110.42
11@MarshallW35-23-4.5——————
12vsApp StateW58-10-11.411616.00160.23
13vsWashington StateW24-203.82147.0080.35
14@Coastal CarolinaW59-10-15.112525.01252.70
20@OregonL34-5125.9252.503—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.1%
Passing plays
6.8%
Rushing plays
0.6%
Standard downs
3.0%
Passing downs
3.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.72
Passing downs
1.61
Pass / Rush EPA
0.73 / 3.00

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.