Skip to content
Kelly Bryant

#7Kelly Bryant

QB·Clemson·20175.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Kelly Bryant is a Dual-Threat QB for Clemson. Kelly's 2017 season ranks in the 15th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 579 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kelly Bryant's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
262/398 Comp/Att2802 Pass yards13 Pass TD8 INT65.8% Comp %
Rushing
665 Rush yards11 Rush TD192 Carries3.5 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts45 Punt yards45.0 Yards/punt45 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency15
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat76
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch57
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs The Citadel.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Kent State: +0.76 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Auburn: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisville: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Boston College: +0.18 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech: +0.36 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Wake Forest: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Syracuse: +0.16 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: +0.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs NC State: +0.24 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida State: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs The Citadel: +0.85 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Carolina: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Miami: +0.34 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Alabama: -0.13 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsKent StateW56-3-20.216/222361195.77710.76
2vsAuburnW14-624.719/291810069.15920.21
3@LouisvilleW47-2119.222/323161066.82620.29
4vsBoston CollegeW34-74.617/261400234.510620.18
5@Virginia TechW31-1714.312/211861078.19400.36
6vsWake ForestW28-1410.521/292001157.93900.12
7@SyracuseL24-274.012/171160045.7-800.16
9vsGeorgia TechW24-108.922/332072080.76700.28
10@NC StateW38-3112.920/381911172.78820.24
11vsFlorida StateW31-1422.820/301510063.66010.14
12vsThe CitadelW61-317/222303097.4500.85
13@South CarolinaW34-107.823/342722175.42600.19
14vsMiamiW38-317.423/292521089.0710.34
1vsAlabamaL6-2433.518/36124027.2190-0.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
55.5%
Passing plays
84.6%
Rushing plays
30.7%
Standard downs
50.8%
Passing downs
67.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.30
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.950−0.22
EPA per play · 2017 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.