Skip to content
Josh Rosen

#3Josh Rosen

QB·UCLA·201720157.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Josh Rosen is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for UCLA. Josh's 2017 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 473 plays — a developing rate for the QB. A five-star recruit in the class of 2015, Josh has shown flashes of the talent that made him a coveted recruit.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Josh Rosen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2015

5-Star · Blue chip
Stars
247 composite
0.9932
National rank
#11
High school
St. John Bosco
Hometown
Bellflower, CA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2017 Production

Passing
282/451 Comp/Att3717 Pass yards26 Pass TD10 INT62.5% Comp %
Rushing
-97 Rush yards2 Rush TD50 Carries-1.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency35
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat79
  • Consistency72
  • Clutch70
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.06 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Hawai'i (SP+ -20).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0601.06Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Hawai'i: +1.06 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Memphis: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stanford: +0.34 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arizona: -0.20 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oregon: +0.28 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Washington: -0.01 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Arizona State: +0.21 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: +0.30 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs California: +0.51 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTexas A&MW45-449.435/594914058.8-1400.47
2vsHawai'iW56-23-19.722/253295098.1-1701.06
3@MemphisL45-487.834/564634268.93210.27
4@StanfordL34-5815.840/604803265.71500.34
5vsColoradoW27-232.028/453721171.4700.32
7@ArizonaL30-473.720/342190320.1-350-0.20
8vsOregonW31-149.121/362662063.7-1100.28
9@WashingtonL23-4422.112/21931023.0-190-0.01
11vsArizona StateW44-371.025/453811153.11310.21
12@USCL23-2817.932/524213158.7-3400.30
13vsCaliforniaW30-27-1.013/182022077.0-3400.51

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.5%
Passing plays
93.1%
Rushing plays
8.9%
Standard downs
55.0%
Passing downs
68.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.190−0.442017
EPA per play · 2015 — 2017 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015UCLA
7.0
218.0
2017UCLA
7.3
219.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.