Skip to content
Jordan McCloud

#3Jordan McCloud

QB·James Madison·2024202312.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jordan McCloud is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for James Madison. Jordan's 2023 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 433 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jordan McCloud's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
282/413 Comp/Att3670 Pass yards35 Pass TD10 INT68.3% Comp %
Rushing
276 Rush yards8 Rush TD96 Carries2.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat81
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch74
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (78th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.96 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Coastal Carolina (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 1 vs Bucknell: +0.86 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah State: +0.79 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Alabama: +0.35 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: +0.67 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Old Dominion: +0.37 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Georgia State: +0.73 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UConn: +0.72 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs App State: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.96 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBucknellW38-37/111442091.31000.86
2@VirginiaW36-35-10.820/312241070.93200.47
3@TroyW16-149.818/262001045.5-2100.10
4@Utah StateW45-38-10.923/343644266.92620.79
5vsSouth AlabamaW31-235.112/222413154.96100.35
7vsGeorgia SouthernW41-13-5.220/312593093.02000.67
8@MarshallW20-9-9.021/312641190.8691
9vsOld DominionW30-27-10.127/403403248.41310.37
10@Georgia StateW42-14-6.828/363074185.310420.73
11vsUConnW44-6-15.633/374574075.7-400.72
12vsApp StateL23-263.827/462891139.2-410.15
13@Coastal CarolinaW56-14-1.226/353245177.5510.96
20vsAir ForceL21-315.920/332573146.8-350

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.2%
Passing plays
95.8%
Rushing plays
17.5%
Standard downs
53.2%
Passing downs
67.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.43
Passing downs
0.60
Pass / Rush EPA
0.52 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.122024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023James Madison
12.8
306.4
2024Texas State
7.1
212.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Jordan Mccloud Stats, EPA & Player Profile — James Madison · Gridpex