Skip to content
JaQuae Jackson
JaQuae Jackson

#9JaQuae Jackson

WR·Rutgers·2023

JaQuae Jackson is a Slot Specialist WR for Rutgers. JaQuae's 2023 season produced 29.4 total EPA across 30 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So JaQuae Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
22 Receptions361 Rec yards1 Rec TD16.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume13
  • Explosiveness63
  • Consistency75
  • Pass-Down75
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.70 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.90 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Michigan State (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.900−2.90Wk 1 vs Northwestern: -0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Temple: +2.28 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Michigan: +1.53 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wagner: +1.33 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: -0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Michigan State: +2.90 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Indiana: +0.01 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Ohio State: +2.24 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Penn State: +1.05 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Maryland: +2.04 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNorthwesternW24-7-1.3144.004-0.17
2vsTempleW36-7-21.049523.80612.28
4@MichiganL7-3131.333712.30171.53
5vsWagnerW52-3—47117.80411.33
6@WisconsinL13-249.434615.3026-0.24
7vsMichigan StateW27-24-6.812929.00292.90
8@IndianaW31-14-7.4188.0080.01
10vsOhio StateL16-3525.234113.71192.24
12@Penn StateL6-2723.511616.00161.05
13vsMarylandL24-4211.011414.00142.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.6%
Passing plays
11.8%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.4%
Passing downs
9.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.88
Passing downs
1.04
Pass / Rush EPA
0.98 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.