Skip to content
Jahmal Edrine
Jahmal Edrine

#7Jahmal Edrine

WR·Purdue·2024

Jahmal Edrine is a Versatile WR for Purdue. Jahmal's 2024 season produced 29.9 total EPA across 30 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jahmal Edrine's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
23 Receptions365 Rec yards2 Rec TD15.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness59
  • Consistency78
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.38 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Penn State (SP+ 25).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.380−2.38Wk 1 vs Indiana State: +0.87 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Notre Dame: +1.42 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: +0.96 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Illinois: +0.25 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oregon: +1.78 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Northwestern: +0.77 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ohio State: -0.31 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Penn State: +2.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: +1.30 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsIndiana StateW49-0—45914.80200.87
3vsNotre DameL7-6623.911818.00181.42
6@WisconsinL6-523.022613.00150.96
7@IllinoisL49-509.625125.51530.25
8vsOregonL0-3526.0177.0071.78
10vsNorthwesternL20-26-8.255410.81280.77
11@Ohio StateL0-4531.211515.0015-0.31
12vsPenn StateL10-4924.624824.00302.38
13@Michigan StateL17-24-4.658717.40271.30
14@IndianaL0-6620.1——————

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.1%
Passing plays
11.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.0%
Passing downs
6.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.56
Passing downs
1.86
Pass / Rush EPA
1.00 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.