Skip to content
Jack Salopek

#6Jack Salopek

Jack Salopek is a Dual-Threat QB for Western Michigan.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jack Salopek's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
42/63 Comp/Att316 Pass yards1 Pass TD2 INT66.7% Comp %
Rushing
46 Rush yards0 Rush TD17 Carries2.7 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts43 Punt yards43.0 Yards/punt43 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume59
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency33
  • Clutch44
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency33th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0901.09Wk 1 vs St. Francis (PA): +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: -0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa: +0.06 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Toledo: -1.09 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Mississippi State: -0.15 EPA/play6
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSt. Francis (PA)W35-1718/261701163.53600.28
2@SyracuseL7-48-4.415/221100130.3-180-0.13
3@IowaL10-415.82/2-20080.52300.06
4@ToledoL31-493.71/33000.3-1.09
6@Mississippi StateL28-410.56/1035003.850-0.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.6%
Passing plays
38.8%
Rushing plays
5.9%
Standard downs
17.4%
Passing downs
28.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.00
Passing downs
0.02
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.06 / 0.49

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Jack Salopek Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Western Michigan · Gridpex